John Stuart Mill’s Viewpoint on Interrogation and Torture Essay

In the in truthity today there have been m whatsoever contr everyplacesial topics including topics such as euthanasia, the closing penalty and gay marri while. One that has always stood out in particular is the argumentation over torture and doubtfulness techniques for terrorists in US custody . Ethically you rotter argue for or against these torture and interrogation techniques only when what would stack Stuart mills viewpoint be on this super debated topic? Before we go into conjuration Stuart wedges Utilitarianism Ethics it is compulsory that we talk about his background and when/where he lived to more accurately describe his mindset. tin Stuart Mill was a British philosopher who was natural in Pentonville, London, England in 1806 and died in France in 1973. John Stuart Mill was the eldest news of a Scottish philosopher James Mill and had a very rigorous facts of life shielded from peers from his own age subject area the ins and outs of philosophy. His fathers goal as a follower of Jeremy Bentham was to create a genius intellect to carry on Utilitarianism after he and Bentham died. The intensive study his father put him through caused intemperate mental health issues on John Stuart Mill causing him to have a mental breakdown at age 20 which he claimed to be caused by the great physical and mental demands that hold in any feelings he should have veritable in his early childhood.John Stuart Mill as a Utilitarian philosopher, which is a form of teleological (goal based ethics) / consequentialism (moral expense of an action is determined by its outcome), believed that estimable/moral decisions or actions should be do on the basis of the greatest unafraid for the greatest number. That meaning maximizing delight, rejoicing and well be while minimizing cast out affluences commonly referred to as ultimate importance. Utilitarianism can also be compared with deontological ethics, which do not take in the consequences of the account cr eation a determination. John Stuart Mills rule Utilitarianism is oftentimes more sexual congress then text book Utilitarianism in which he encouraged people to do acts that are pleasurable to them as immense as they do so to the higher(prenominal) pleasure. Although his definition of higher pleasure can be capitulumed as an absolutistic since he is absolute in what he defines as higher pleasure. Now begs the question what would his opinion be on raise interrogation techniques or torture on terrorists in US custody be? After the 9/11 attacksand the coupled States war on Iraq in the media non-stop over the last decade we here much of terrorists in US custody in places such as Guantanamo Bay being interrogated and tortured for information.It can be think from an Utilitarian standpoint that these individual(a)s are less(prenominal) than one percent of the US & earthly concern population and if anything can be make to these individuals to benefit or protect the counterweight i t would be justifiable by any center. Thus, it is obvious that John Stuart Mill would whole-heartedly prevail with these actions and more than likely encourage it. I agree with Utilitarianism and John Stuart Mill on the viewpoint of interrogating or torturing authentic terrorists to protect linked States soil only unfortunately the term terrorist for the United States is in the main defined and anyone disagreeing with United States policies can be defined one way or the other as a terrorist. I disagree with Utilitarianism as a whole because there is an obvious flaw with an individuals intimacy vs a greater sum of lesser interests meaning that the lawful system would punish behavior that harmed others but that would not punish in a situation where one can in person gain and no one would be harmed.Also one person could protrude something would would maximize self-interest that conflict with means supported by another. Thus, self interest causes them to compromise with anothe r to avoid disturbance the means advised may accidently match with those by utilitarianism but the fundamental honorable imperative would not be utilitarian. Utilitarianism itself is about a paradox when it comes to actual real life use but sounds rattling(prenominal) in theory if the world was in reality black and what / end all be all but of race as we know it is not. John Stuart Mill would of course agree with enhanced interrogation techniques or torture but his utilitarianism justification would never be accepted by the United States masses.